I knew I save everything I can for a reason. I read one of J’s Tumblr entries on a movie about the Three Gorges Dam, and tried to find the paper I wrote on it way back in middle school.
I couldn’t find the paper (maybe it’s on a floppy disk somewhere at home), but I did come across my archive of essays I wrote during my high school years. I might post some of the more interesting ones here and there. Here is one on people:
[Sunday, April 01, 2001]
…
I read somewhere that the majority of people in America are linked by only two acquaintances. That’s pretty spiffy. To think that I could very well be two people away from the girl I’m going to marry, two people away from the president (actually, one person away; I knew one of the Bush daughters), two people away from anyone at all. Is our world really that small? Figuratively speaking, of course. I think it would be very amusing to be able to look at the world from a distance and follow the courses of people’s lives, to see how they live, how they think, how they see the world themselves. Perhaps that is why we like to watch movies. Movies are a way for us to escape our own lives and participate in others’.
…



March 24, 2008
A little meta, anyone?
Posted by Qing under Links, Musings | Tags: blog, chinese food, classmate, comment, food, link, math, meta |[2] Comments
Wow, first meta-post. I hope I don’t do this too often. So I added a link to this blog on my Facebook profile recently, and the views shot way up. Thanks for the support, guys! Please do comment, as I appreciate any feedback on what is interesting, what is not, and what is worth posting about more. Ideally, this would be a conversation, and not just me talking at empty space.
I’ve added two more links to my blogroll: J’s and my Tumblr accounts. It’s a more convenient way to post the shorter things like a link or a photo. J also found a way to enable comments on Tumblr, so it’s even more awesome.
And just to keep this post a little non-meta, B came to visit today (he’s a classmate who is the same year as me). Five of us went to P. F. Chang’s today for dinner. It’s not authentic Chinese food, but very good anyways (try the lettuce wraps!).
Anyway, it was amusing to observe the different conversations that people have, depending on the group that is present. For example, the average intelligence level of our conversation was about that of a herd of chinchillas (i.e. nonexistent), whereas every once in a while, it would spike to some rather lofty value. Examples include when someone mentioned that the yellow stripes in the parking lot made a triangle if you projected it from hyperbolic space to normal Euclidean space; and, ironically, when we were talking about how dumb our banter was.
On a related note, I read somewhere a long time ago that the amount of meta-discussion increases with intelligence level. I think B got to 5 or 6 levels of meta-ness before we all collapsed back into chinchillas. Does this make me a level 7 meta-rodent?